The comparison is between Sayyid Qutb and Muhammad Hassan not between Muhammad Hassaan and Shaykh Bakr, please always read between the lines.
The convergence is if Shaykh Bakr was excused for his defence of Sayyid Qutb, defence I said, why can't we excuse Halabi not for his defence of Muhammad Hassan because he actually faulted his positions, but his failure not to agree to his tabdee?
I said between Sayyid Qutb and Muhammad Hassan who was worse? Of course Sayyid Qutb.
Yet you said Shaykh Abu Bakr's stance on jamaa'at is known. I say so also Al-Halabi. In fact if you don't know, we used to do muqaaranah of Hukm Intimaa of Shaykh Bakr with Da'watu Ilaa Llaah of Shaykh Halabi as well as Jamaa'ah Waahidah of Shaykh Rabee then. I don't where you were then. Are you aware Halabi wrote Da'watu Ilaa Allaah?
No doubt Shaykh Bakr belonged to the Kibaar and he had his publications and tahqeeqaat the same way Al-Halabi had his. Till date his Sifatu Naum Nabiyy which he co-authored with Shaykh Saleem al-Hilaalee remains one of the best on the topic.
You said ilhaaq is done to someone who knows that someone is a mubtadi not someone who does not know! You have started the dribbling again.
Ok why doing ilhaaq of Al-Halabi who does not believe that Muhammad Hassan is not a mubtadi. And why are you doing our ilhaaq with Al-Halabi that we know and are convinced that he was not mubtadi?
If I say alabosi ni yÃn you will say I am doing ẹÌkẹ̀ èébú.
E ṣáá loosun. Ọ̀rá»Ì€ yÃn gan tà suu ara yin.
Alhamdulillah Dr Faadil is not a mubtadi by your definition, help tell your friend Abu Haneefah too, hope he will not do your ilhaaq with him. I am sure your friend in Ilorin will be angry at that your position. As for Abu Nabeel, he will soon make a release on you as he did for Aláṣẹ and Abu Ibeji.
Kati kati and jati jati.
