Malik has consistently claimed that the Qur'an is full of errors. He has attempted to produce a few of these so-called errors—alhamdulillah, we have responded to them, and he has gone silent ever since.

In his latest video, however, he reiterated the same tired claim and said he would bring up more examples.

In shaa’ Allah, we await him. Aa ni kú a ní rùn, in shaa’ Allah.

Yes, I told him that the Qur’an never describes itself as a book of science. Rather, it is a book of wisdom—a divine guidance that may inform or inspire scientific reflection, but it is not authored as a science textbook.

What we know about the perspective of most Muslims is that they see the Qur’an as a book of power, wisdom, and guidance. No ordinary, devout Muslim opens the Qur’an seeking scientific facts.

Yes, there are some Muslims—perhaps from academic circles—who explore how certain Qur’anic verses align with scientific knowledge. You must be aware of the world-renowned embryologist, Professor Keith L. Moore, who, upon examining what the Qur’an says about stages of human development, made remarkable statements. Consider the excerpts below:

> “It is clear to me that these statements [in the Qur'an] must have come to Muhammad from God, because almost all of this knowledge was not discovered until many centuries later. This proves to me that Muhammad must have been a messenger of God.”

> “The stages of human development as described in the Qur’an are classified today into different stages of development. The amazing thing is that the descriptions in the Qur'an are very accurate.”

> “I was amazed at the scientific accuracy of these statements which were made in the 7th century CE.”

You see, these kinds of acknowledgments are appreciated mostly within academic circles. The average Qur’an-literate Muslim knows that the Qur’an transcends such matters.

But to people like you, Malik, such discoveries deeply unsettle you—perhaps because you believe the Qur’an shouldn’t contain such insights.

So to you, the Muslims who approach the Qur'aan from that perspective, and who engage in Comparative Debates, are the ones to destroy Islam.

Well, that’s your problem. As for us, we turn to the Qur’an to quench our spiritual thirst.

We’ve read much of Shakespeare, John Milton, Samuel Johnson, Daniel Defoe, and others. Their writings added no real value to our spiritual journey.

I once read The Mayor of Casterbridge—as voluminous as it is—in just a few days. It taught me nothing of worth.

But the Qur’an? There is no comparison. The day I laid hands on Yusuf Ali’s translation, I read it all for some days from cover to cover—even before I had formal training in Arabic. You were probably not even born then, Malik. Forgive me if that stings.

So all your noise about the Qur’an amounts to nothing. Allah has promised to preserve His Book, and nothing will ever taint it.

He has endowed some men and women the wisdom to ensure that. Those men are unbeatable.

I saw you taking aim at a Muslim brother who, out of enthusiasm, may have misinterpreted some verses. You pounced on him like a lazy wolf upon a fallen fox.

Malik, stop going after soft targets—those Muslims who are probably creating short content for platforms like TikTok. Instead, come and debate those who have openly challenged you.

As for me, I am here—with my pen. That is my weapon for Islam, in addition to teaching others its foundations.