A Rejoinder to Abu Mazeedatilkhayr Bn Sa'eed
This post of yours is nothing other than what it is: self appraisals and skewing of facts to suit your whims. Brother, you can't be the complainer and be the judge at the same time, let me also help you highlight some crystal clear lessons from the fuss you initiated vis-à-vis some of your self acclaimed achievements here:
1. If you count it as an achievement that people insulted you then think about how you started the insults by affirming that those whom you disagree with are products of Zinah, rats among other insults not beffiting of a common Muslim let alone a "big scholar like you". Hence, you don't have the moral ground to accuse people of lacking manners when your words and actions also indicate you're also ill-mannered. You even threatened to charge people to court when you can't handle the disgrace you brought upon yourself!
2. "Lajama argument" is one you created from your imagination so how do you expect an evidence from others to substantiate what you DUBIOUSLY ascribed to them? O Abu Mazeedah I challenge you to bring one traceable evidence from salafi sources calling to "LA jamah", you will never find it except in your imaginations. However, what the scholars warned against and with consensus is the concept of Hizbiyah (partisanship) and firqah (sect). If Hizbiyah towards an individual is a grevious sin, what do you say about organized form of hizbiyyah that we see in many of these so called Muslim organization? Speak against "awon elegbe radarada" (upon organized Hizbiyah); it is a blessed Da'wah!
3. If your concern is not about the prohibition of rebellion or otherwise, what is your concern? O clearly! Your concern is to force it down our throat that the Saudi (rulers, scholars from the past and present) only emphasised it to cement their throne and so what? Therefore, we should act against clear prohibitions of the Shari'ah and stop warning people against it because you have "established" Saudis are not sincere about the prohibition? What kind of Fiqh is this? Egbon this affair is an affair of the Deen don't give in to your political tendencies. Or do you say, we should all become like Ikhwaniy in thought whose activism is all centered upon hijacking political powers - which way to go?
4. Salafiyyah is not personality, it is a methodology - deal with it. If you are a serious student (no insult intended) of the Manhaj, you would realize why any Muslim wouldn't want to dissociate himself from the ways of the Salaf but then an ordinary claim doesn't suffice but living upon their (salaf) standards. You know within yourself that even if Muhammad Yusuf al-khariji claims salafiyyah ten thousand and more times through speeches and writings that doesn't make him one except by conforming with the methodology of the salaf. How do you read the books of Aqeedah, if you read them at all, if you don't understand the reason behind distinguishing people on the basis of their Aqeedah with such label as "salafis" "athari", "sunni", etc?
5. So all those who point out your errors and refute your lies are jobless? What a sweeping insult. Man, stop this empty show off, many are not petty as going around to unnecessarily announce what they do for a living.
6. If you really accept you hastily spread rumour about mawlid, you should know the conditions of sincere tawbah attached to such grave error. Do the needful!
