They finally came out but with the subtle deflection still.
They now hold to the matter of Shaykh Yahya al-Hajooree - hafidhahullaah and may Allaah pardon him for his errors.
They said they have no right to withdraw their tabdee of him unless those who made the tabdee do so themsleves, and that even if the accused Shaykh made clarifications by bringing proofs for his views, they would still not accept them until the Senior Scholars (the Senior Scholars here are just three o, and the main scholar gan gan is Shaykh Ubayd Al-Jaabiree who until later when Shaykh Rabee joined him) pass him because they know more than them. He asked: 'Who am I to precede the Senior Scholars?'
Super understanding of the manhaj you will think. Wallaah it is sheer hizbiyyah.
The implication of their statement is that if those Senior Scholars go against a Saheeh Hadeeth (which is highly possible, because they can't know all the Hadeeth), they will not act by the purport of the Saheeh Hadeeth until those scholars do so.
That is Ayn Hizbiyyah!
I don't know where they got the maxim from that whoever disparaged a person must be the one to praise him back.
The implication of that is, all the Jar'h that was rejected in kutub Sunnah by Ta'deelat of other Imaams are null and void.
How do they interprete this statement 'we love our Shaykh but we love the truth above them'?
It is glaring they love 'their' Shaykh above the truth.
I am coming, Inshaa Allaah.
