The young man who called me a boy wrote that I was making 'EMOTIONAL OUTBURSTS AGAINST THE SALAFI MASHAYIKH'.
That was his first deceit known with people like him. Who were the Salafi Mashaayikh I was writing about?
His reaction was to the fact that in the recent past I had been writing to expose the hizbiyyah (partisanhip) they were building around the triad of Shaykh Rabee (hafidhahullaah), Shaykh Ubayd (rahimahullah) and Shaykh Abdullah Al-Bukhari (hafidhahullaah).
To those boys, and their mentors in the UK, led by Abu Khadeejah SPUBS (whom they have been tumbling over for my calling him out), you dare not say they are behaving like a cult, they would say you are attacking the three mashaayikh.
They might not be bold to say it, that Abu Khadeejah SPUBS, was among the Salafi Mashaayikh they meant to say I was writing against.
Abu Khadeejah SPUBS is a despicable individual, in the words of ash-Shaykh al-Allaamah Wasiyyullah Abbaas, Mufti of Makkah, hafidhahullaah.
He made a detailed Jar'h of him so the praise of Shaykh Rabee, Shaykh Ubayd, etc, for him is not to be considered here, because that Jar'h is Ziyaadatul Ilm.
Isn't that one of the principles? So let's continue to use it.
Here is the link to what Shaykh Wasiyyullah Abbaas - hafidhahullaah - said about him akheeran when some people tried to blackmail the Shaykh to retract his earlier Jar'h on Aboo Khadeejah:
The Shaykh said, Abu Khadeejah and those with him are not (real) students of knowledge let alone scholars!
You can contend with that.
Let me inform you in advance, you have many things to contend with in this series.
Shaykh Wasiyyullah - hafidhahullaah - said he sat with him for hours, that he was wrong in his manhaj.
So who were the Salafi Mashaayikh I was writing against?
Or you meant to also say I disparaged Shaykh Abdullah Al-Bukhari?
Never, I only set the record straight about him, and exposed your deceit around his personality.
May Allaah preserve him on goodness.
The young man also wrote:
'1. Calling salafis neo-hizbees : In this half baked article of his, he referred to Salafis as neo-hizbees. This is not a new trait to see from someone like him, who spends his lifetime hating and plotting against the Salafis and deceiving people by feigning knowledge yet it would have been better for him if he never opened his mouth to dwell into religious affair.'
My response:
He said I called his group new hizbees (new partisans), yes of course. The hizbiyyah is even worse as we had thought.
Hasn't al-Akh Olanrewaju Alhasan Adedokun been exposing your hizbee traits which none of you could debunk till date?
Havent we seen that you only call to yourselves and use the names of the good Shaykhs such as Shaykh Rabee as a smokescreen to perpetrate your evil?
The 15-point allegations of hizbiyyah (and others) against you by al-Akh Ridwan Hasan, have you answered them?
Your hizbiyyah is worse, just go and repent from it before it consumes all of you.
Yes you said I have spent all my years hating the 'Salafis', no. I have spent all my life hating hizbees like you. I will continue to do so Inshaa Allaah.
Allaah the Mighty Lord granted me the opportunity to be among those who fought the hizbiyyah of jama'aat to a standstill in Yorùbáland. Didn't you read my 'The Message to the Intelligent' and 'Demystifying the Laa Jamaa'h Label'? Or were you still a kid when those were written? Wait a minute, how old are you? Have you reached puberty when the Salafis of Yorùbáland were tagged 'Laa Jamaa'h?' Do you hear the tag again? So you think it just disappeared. Some people worked to silence those who used to utter it, alhamdulillah I was among the numerous fighters.
So it is hizbiyyah which you and your people are exhibiting today that I hate. Inshaa Allaah we will not relent until we silence you too.
We silenced the hizbees of old, you the new hizbees would follow then into the dustbin of history too Inshaa Allaah.
You said I am feigning knowledge. So you know I have some knowledge I can feign. Smiles.
Young man, I am still a learner but not a jaahil like you and your masters in Hizbiyyah who rate the scholars' statements above the texts of the Shariah.
You said I dabble into religious matters, or you mean to say you are pained that I exposed your deceit that the Honourable Shaykh Abdullah Bukhari - hafidhahullaah - never saw himself as part of the Kibaar, and no scholars ever said he is.
This a challenge in advance, tell us a scholar who said Shaykh Abdullaah Al-Bukhari belongs to the Kibaar. You see that Tazkiyyah from Shaykh Ubayd to Shaykh Al-Bukhari, we are coming to it, I will analyse it word by word, and bring tens of other tazkiyaat of other mashaayikh to other upcoming scholars.
It is a long ride, I have promised you all.
Our young man also wrote:
'Imam AbdurRahmon ibn Abi Haatim said, as it has been reported by Imaam Al-Lakaaiy in sharh usul wa’itiqod ahl sunnah (2/136) : I (Ibn Abi Haatim) heard my father (Abu Haatim) saying “From the signs of the people of innovation is slandering the people of atharâ€.'
My response:
Yes it is true but not for people like you because it has been incontrovertibly established that you are upon profound hizbiyyah that seeks to corrupt the young boys and girls so it is from the way of the Salaf to label people like you.
One, the terms hizbiyyah and ta'assub are what people of Sunnah use today for people who restrict the truth to what their group alone stands upon even in the face of clear contradiction of the Sunnah.
So just as the Salaf of old would tag some people Jahmiyyah, Mur'jia, Khawaarij, Kulaabiyyah, Rawaafid, Ash'aariyyah, Lafdhiyyah, Waaqifiyyah, Soofiyyah, Matreediyyah, etc, this tag of neo-hizbiyyah fits you well until you shakes it off with taubah and good conduct.
So, tell your neo-hizbee folks to take heart.
The time is still on your side to make amends.
He wrote:
'When you consider the aforementioned Abu Haatim’s words, you won’t be surprised by his slandering and labelling of salafis with such names and attributes. He referred to salafis as partisans THRICE in the first three paragraphs alone.'
My response:
This is quite laughable. Where did I call Salafis hizbees?
Another deceit from you. I singled you, in Ilorin, out and said it categorically that you are upon hizbiyyah not salafiyyah even if you make a thousand claims, then you came back saying I called (all) the Salafis hizbiyyoon.
So any attack on your wrongdoing is an attack on Salafiyyah even with all these your proven contraventions of the manhaj of Salafiyyah?
Come on, stop it.
A critique of the shenanigans of 'Pristine' Boys can never be an attack on Salafis rather an attack on troublemakers and claimers of Salafiyyah.
Salafiyyah and Hizbiyyah are two poles apart, you can't be this and be that, not possible.
You can prove it however, that a Salafi can still be a hizbee.
I will be waiting Inshaa Allaah.
Wait a minute, young man. Did you say you are the people of Sunnah everybody is attacking?
When did that start?
So you can now claim victims of what you have been known with?
Tell us, how many scholars in Nigeria you have not abused and said unprintable names about?
Tell us which scholar is 'gbádùn' In Nigeria and is not 'à gbákò'?
Tell us which one among them is not upon deviation, according to your own myopic definition?
Even if we go abroad, tell us who remains among the scholars of the world that you, and your UK goons, have not pushed off the cliff?
Please how many Salafi scholars remain?
So you can come here and say some people are disparaging you? Taste just a bit of your own poison and see how good it is.
So that maxim of Al-Imaam Muhammad bn Idrees Al-Handhalee, rahmatullaah alayhi, that you brought is actually against you.
'So the sign of the people of heresy is that they speak ill of people of Athar.'
So stop speaking ill of the scholars who teach the Qur'aan and Sunnah upon the method of the Salaf, home and abroad, perhaps you will have your wellbeing back for you have indeed lost it.
He wrote:
'Firstly, you need to understand that it wasn’t those “pristine boys†who placed Al-Allamah AbduLLah Al-Bukhari above those who you -in your poor and short sightedness- deem older than the shaykh and more knowledgeable than him, it was the elder sunni schorlars who placed him in that position.'
My response:
This is the crux of the matter, and this is where the major deceit is.
Nobody disputes the fact that Shaykh Abdullah bn Abdulraheem Al-Bukhari - hafidhahullaah - is among the scholars of the Ummah in the present time but the issue is is he among the SENIOR SCHOLARS?
This is what we expected you to answer which you failed to.
Shaykh Rabee and Shaykh Ubayd could make praises about him but did they say he is among the SENIOR SCHOLARS? That is the question.
So our argument is if they didn't say that, then it is the imagination of some other people, who perhaps have an agenda to run, which you here are parroting sheepishly because you have been sheepish all your lives (as you said me too have been hating the 'Salafis' all my life).
So if you want us to believe he belongs to the Senior Cadre of the Salafi scholars while singly him out among tens of others?
Shaykh Wasiyyullah, Shaykh Saalih as-Suhaymee, Shaykh Sulayman ar-Ruhaylee, Shaykh Muhammad bn Haadee, etc all there, you don't regard them as SENIOR SCHOLARS for the reasons me and you know.
Or don't we know the reasons?
I only mentioned some of our local scholars to bait you and you fell for it for you are. novices.
I could see that you tactically avoided the Saudi scholars I mentioned and once again descended on the local scholars which I could prove to you had their doctorates before (or alongside) Dr Abdullah Al-Bukhari.
I am quite sure that part is the most painful to you. Sorry, it is the truth.
So you said which scholars gave our own local scholars tazkiyyah forgetting that the doctorate degree is an ipso factor (do you understand that?).
Yet you tried to mumble up the discussion by smuggling in some personalities to score a point.
Everything will be analysed here bit by bit Inshaa Allaah.
You will not say I am 'howling' in your next rebuttal but 'roaring' yes like a lion.
